The Energy Report
Millennial Lithium CEO Farhad Abasov speaks with Peter Epstein of Epstein Research about his company’s just released bank feasibility study.
The following CEO interview was conducted by email in the two weeks ended August 18th. At a time when “battery metals” junior mining companies have been stalled, not just lithium companies, but cobalt, vanadium and other high-tech, “green” metals, Millennial Lithium Corp. (ML:TSX.V; MLNLF:OTCMKTS) has advanced its flagship project all the way through a Bank Feasibility Study (BFS). And, the company still has approximately C$30 million in the bank.
Millennial’s BFS describes a lithium brine project that could reach commercial production in 2021. A pilot plant will be up and running later this year. Off-take discussions are well underway, and management’s goal is to have project financing arranged by year end. These are exciting times for the team.
Get our Weekly Commitment of Traders Report: - See where the biggest traders (Hedge Funds and Commercial Hedgers) are positioned in the futures markets on a weekly basis.
Get Our Free Metatrader 4 Indicators - Put Our Free MetaTrader 4 Custom Indicators on your charts when you join our Weekly Newsletter
This morning (August 19th), Lithium Americas (TSX: LAC) announced the closing of a US$160 million cash injection from Ganfeng Lithium, taking Ganfeng’s ownership in the Caucharí-Olaroz JV project from 37.5% to 50%. This was done at the project level; no new shares of Lithium Americas were issued. US$160 million for an additional 12.5% values the project at US$1.28 billion, 50% attributable to LAC. Great news for Lithium Americas and for other advanced-stage lithium brine projects in Argentina, such as Millennial’s 100%-owned Pastos Grandes project.
Peter Epstein: Please give us the very latest snapshot of Millennial Lithium.
Farhad Abasov: The big news for us is that we released a Bank Feasibility Study (BFS) on our flagship 100%-owned Pastos Grandes lithium brine project. The after-tax NPV (8%) of US$1 billion was 25% above the NPV (8%) number in the preliminary economic assessment (PEA). We are one of just three or four companies with BFS-stage projects in Argentina, putting us, we think, 618 months ahead of most peers, some of whom will never reach BFS stage. The other two publicly listed players, Australia-listed Galaxy Resources and Lithium Americas, have much larger market caps than we do, even after consideration of other projects they own.
We are building a pilot plant that will operate at 3 tonnes of lithium carbonate per month, allowing us to build up an inventory of finished product to send to customers and for ongoing test work. With a BFS and pilot plant in hand, we will be well positioned to talk to prospective strategic and financial parties, as well as potential off-take partners. Those discussions are underway.
Peter Epstein: Almost everyone agrees that demand for lithium will be off the charts by the mid-2020s, but investment in the sector has been anemic. Is there a disconnect?
Farhad Abasov: Unfortunately, there’s a lot of confusion in the market, helped along by self-proclaimed experts, most of whom have little experience with specialty chemicals in general, or lithium in particular. Keep one thing in mind, the oversupply in spodumene concentrate is related only to the shortage of available chemical conversion capacity in China. It has nothing to do with global demand for lithium chemicals.
While newsworthy setbacks on lithium projects such as Nemaska’s has created a heightened degree of uncertainty, the market could consume four times as much lithium carbonate in 2025 or 2026 than was produced last year. Increases in supply this year and next come nowhere near meeting this scale of growth. I find it hard to believe that the entire market could be in oversupply in the medium term, notwithstanding short-term oversupply in the near term.
Peter Epstein: What are the most important differences between Millennial’s PEA and your newly released BFS?
Farhad Abasov: Good question. A key difference was that production of 25,000 tonnes/year in the PEA (20,000 tonnes battery grade (>99.5% Li2CO3) and 5,000 tonnes technical grade), has been enhanced. The production rate in the BFS is 24,000 tonnes/year, but it’s now 100% battery grade. Also, life of mine was extended from 25 to 40 years. Importantly, the level of accuracy in our BFS is much tighter at +15%/-15%, versus +35%/-35% in the PEA.
The cap-ex number in the BFS is 9% higher than that of the PEA due to three items. First, the addition of a final purification stage to ensure battery-grade (99.5% Li2CO3) lithium carbonate production. Second, the inclusion of a photo-voltaic plant to provide low-cost power, and third, an operations camp, (the PEA assumed the use of a contractor).
Op-ex increased by 5% due to higher usage and cost of reagents, primarily soda ash and lime, and the inclusion of the purification stage I mentioned. The BFS also included a pond expansion beginning in year 5 to maintain production levels and improve product quality. So, an increase of 9% and 3% in capex/opex, but an increase of 25% in after-tax NPV and a higher degree of certainty in project fundamentals.
Peter Epstein: What are the primary business catalysts for the remainder of the year? First half of 2020?
Farhad Abasov: The primary catalysts are the construction and start of a pilot processing plant, approval of our EIA by Salta province officials, securing off-take agreements, obtaining financial commitments and ongoing discussions with prospective strategic and financial partners in the lithium and energy industries.
Peter Epstein: What are the main takeaways of the BFS?
Farhad Abasov: We maintained and/or improved many financial metrics. We reported an after-tax IRR of 24% (before tax 28%), and NPV8 of US$1 billion (before tax US$1.6 billion). All indications are that Pastos Grandes can be a successful, high-purity lithium carbonate producer with capex and opex in line with other low-cost brine operations and projects in Argentina.
The BFS has opex at approximately $3,400 per tonne of battery grade lithium carbonate, placing the proposed operation in the lowest quartile of production costs, making it less vulnerable to lithium pricing and more attractive to funding partners.
Peter Epstein: Why aren’t giant car companies getting behind specific lithium projects or companies in Argentina? Toyota, Volkswagen, BMW, Nissan, Ford, GM, Honda have market caps averaging over US$50 billion.
Farhad Abasov: Automakers know the car business, not chemicals. Not since the days of Henry Ford have they had, or even exerted, direct presence in the materials supply chain. Large car companies are under the mistaken impression that lithium is a commodity, that supply can be “switched on” at short notice.
The message has not seemed to penetrate this type of end-useraccustomed as they are to working at very large volumes, but low marginsthat lithium supply is exactly the opposite.
Peter Epstein: No one can question Argentina’s mineral wealth, especially its lithium. However, the country has high inflation, a weak currency and a presidential election in three months. How risky is Argentina?
Farhad Abasov: Country risk in Argentina is overstated due to “flashy” headlines. The population as a whole is well educated and productive, hampered only by a legacy of sub-optimal policies, which are resolvable. As far as natural resources go, the country has low-cost lithium brine sources and a national mining law that is among the most transparent in the world.
Peter Epstein: Please brag about your management team, board and technical advisers.
Farhad Abasov: We have an excellent and experienced team in place; both on the capital markets side and especially within our technical team. We have been a part of numerous mining successes including multiple M&A transactions. Given the strength of the Pastos Grandes project, we’ve been able to attract a world-class mining team; with experience in lithium project development, mining and processing. I invite readers to please visit our website for full biographies of our team.
Peter Epstein: Who are your largest shareholders?
Farhad Abasov: By group, management and insiders are still the largest shareholder at approximately 20%. Hong Kong listed GCL, one of the largest solar power companies in the world, owns 17%. A number of other well-known funds in Europe, Asia and North America own a combined 10%.
Peter Epstein: You moved directly from Preliminary Economic Assessment to Bank Feasibility Study, skipping the Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) that almost every other company does. How did your team get comfortable with this decision?
Farhad Abasov: The main factor is that the Pastos Grandes brine reserve is relatively uncomplicated. While having to address normal issues associated with building and commissioning a new extraction operation and a high-purity chemical production facility, Millennial does not have to invent or develop anything new.
The process, already shown to work on our brine, is the norm in the industry. With no new technology to develop, prove and trial, we felt it was not necessary to extend the development path. As important, the team is highly experienced in specialty chemicals and lithium, from extraction through to marketing and strategy.
Peter Epstein: Funding Pastos Grande will be a major undertaking. What methods are you considering?
Farhad Abasov: At this time, funding will most likely include a combination of standard project debt, equity and off-take agreements /pre-payments on off-take. We’ve been diligently working on project financing for Pastos Grandes over the past year. We hope to have our financing in place before year-end.
Peter Epstein: Is there a scenario in which Millennial would not use solar evaporation ponds?
Farhad Abasov: There are no plans, nor any need to alter course at this time. Testing and implementing direct extraction technologies would be expensive in terms of both time and cost. There is only one direct extraction operation in the world today, and available expertise to develop such an operation is very difficult to find.
Peter Epstein: Please explain how your team is interacting with local communities.
Farhad Abasov: Millennial has enjoyed very good relations with the local community. Our two main projects include a joint business development and recreation building, designed so that the company and the community can work side-by-side for the benefit of the project, while also providing business opportunities for local residents. The most popular activity at this time is the commissioning of a new water well for the village.
Water supply to date has been from a surface stream. Drawing from surface water in an area with both humans and a robust domesticated animal population, has led to poor public health in the village. Millennial’s geologists identified and drilled a deeper well into a cleaner water aquifer. Testing proved that it is clear of contaminants, allowing us to install and commission a new local distribution system later this month.
Peter Epstein: Why should readers consider buying shares of Millennial Lithium over other lithium companies?
Farhad Abasov: We have the right team in the right place at the right time. Despite fiscal challenges in Argentina, it’s still the first or second best place on earth to harvest lithium with solar evaporation ponds. Lithium prices have come down from very high levels, but we don’t need a high lithium price next year or the year after. By the time we’re ramping up production we expect prices to be stronger.
We have an advanced-stage project with a BFS on it. As end users figure out that global supply of battery-grade lithium is highly uncertain, they will turn to the most advanced projects. Our Pastos Grandes project, Lithium Americas’ JV project with Ganfeng, and Galaxy’s Sal de Vida project are, without question, three of the most advanced brine projects in the world. We have about $30 million in cash, enough to fund us into next year.
Peter Epstein is the founder of Epstein Research. His background is in company and financial analysis. He holds an MBA degree in financial analysis from New York University’s Stern School of Business.
Disclosures: The content of this article is for information only. Readers fully understand and agree that nothing contained herein, written by Peter Epstein of Epstein Research [ER], (together, [ER]) about First Vanadium Corp., including but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts, calculations, etc. is not to be considered implicit or explicit investment advice. Nothing contained herein is a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security. [ER] is not responsible under any circumstances for investment actions taken by the reader. [ER] has never been, and is not currently, a registered or licensed financial advisor or broker/dealer, investment advisor, stockbroker, trader, money manager, compliance or legal officer, and does not perform market making activities. [ER] is not directly employed by any company, group, organization, party or person. The shares of First Vanadium Corp. are highly speculative, not suitable for all investors. Readers understand and agree that investments in small cap stocks can result in a 100% loss of invested funds. It is assumed and agreed upon by readers that they will consult with their own licensed or registered financial advisors before making any investment decisions.
AX1 Capital Corp. retained Epstein Research for a six-month advertising campaign. AX1 Capital is closely affiliated with Millennial Lithium. It is 100%-owned by a single individual who has a contract for services with Millennial Lithium. This individual owns 150,000 restricted share units and a similarly modest number of warrants in the company. Therefore, readers should consider Epstein Research [ER] to be biased in favor of Millennial Lithium. Peter Epstein of [ER] does not own any shares, warrants, options or restricted share units of Millennial Lithium.
Readers understand and agree that they must conduct their own due diligence above and beyond reading this article. While the author believes he’s diligent in screening out companies that, for any reasons whatsoever, are unattractive investment opportunities, he cannot guarantee that his efforts will (or have been) successful. [ER] is not responsible for any perceived, or actual, errors including, but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts & financial calculations, or for the completeness of this article or future content. [ER] is not expected or required to subsequently follow or cover events & news, or write about any particular company or topic. [ER] is not an expert in any company, industry sector or investment topic.
Streetwise Reports Disclosure:
1) Peter Epstein’s disclosures are listed above.
2) The following companies mentioned in the article are billboard sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. Click here for important disclosures about sponsor fees. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the interview or the decision to write an article until three business days after the publication of the interview or article. The foregoing prohibition does not apply to articles that in substance only restate previously published company releases.
Graphics provided by the author.
( Companies Mentioned: ML:TSX.V; MLNLF:OTCMKTS,